printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Earman, John. World enough and space-time. ” Bradford. World Enough and Spacetime. John Earman. MIT press () John Earman – – International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2) – John Earman, World Enough and Space-time: Absolute vs. relational theories of Theories of Space and Time: A Review of John Earman’s “World Enough and .
|Published (Last):||23 April 2012|
|PDF File Size:||8.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.83 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Manuel rated it really liked it Oct 06, Related articles in Web of Science Google Scholar.
World Enough and Space-Time: Sign in to use this feature. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute vs. Relational Theories of Space and Time by John Earman
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 2: John Earman wkrld – In Dennis Dieks ed.
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Causal Concepts in Biology: If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in.
This entry has no external links. Steve Dustcircle marked it as to-read Nov 18, Thanks for telling us about the problem. Don’t have an account? Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation sorld not provide a proxy.
REVIEW | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | Oxford Academic
Andreas Bartels – – Erkenntnis 45 1: Incredibly powerful counterarguments are presented against both positions, most notably that relationalism cannot account for centrifugal forces and the field theory approach of modern physics, while absolutism cannot rescue determinism from the jaws of the hole argument.
The somewhat avoidant conclusion is not as unpleasant as it might be on other questions.
Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion. John marked it as to-read Dec 08, Sara Abahussain marked it as to-read Apr 17, Justin rated it really liked it Oct 09, Thus, Earman’s conclusion is derived quite convincingly form the arguments presented.
World Enough and Spacetime
Sign In Forgot password? Trivia About World Enough and During the first half of the book, one can’t help but feel that Earman is being a bit biased towards the absolutist side of the debate, but during the later chapters where Einstein’s hole argument is introduced, this bias vanishes completely leading to the impression that Earman is simply being critical of fallacious arguments.
Luc rated it liked it Apr 08, Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. Theories of Newtonian Gravity and Empirical Indistinguishability. Akhil Prem marked it as to-read Dec 31, History of Western Philosophy. Vincent Lam – – Philosophy of Science 74 5: What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? He separates the issues and provides new perspectives on absolute versus rational accounts of motion and substantive versus rational accounts of the ontology of spacetime, revitalizing the connection of the deba Earman introduces and clarifies the historical and philosophical development of the clash between Newton’s absolute conception of space and Leibniz’s relative one.
Earman introduces and clarifies the historical and philosophical development of the clash between Newton’s absolute conception of space and Leibniz’s relative one. John Norton – – PSA: Geoffrey Gorham – – Intellectual History Review 22 1: Substantivalism about Spacetime in Philosophy of Physical Science.
Spacetime the One Substance.
Structural Explanations in Minkowski Spacetime: Relationism about Spacetime in Philosophy of Physical Andd. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. Refresh and try again.